Talk:Sonnet 28

Sonnet 28 was nominated as a Language and literature good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (February 7, 2015, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

This article was nominated for deletion on 2006 June 30. The result of the discussion was keep.

Shakespeare Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shakespeare, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of William Shakespeare on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShakespeareWikipedia:WikiProject ShakespeareTemplate:WikiProject ShakespeareShakespeare articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poetry

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Sonnet 28/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 22:09, 31 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Will have this one to you soon ☯ Jaguar ☯ 22:09, 31 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Initial comments edit

"it highlights the Renaissance ideal of male fidelity and equality" - Renaissance should be linked to something if it is capitalised (or a an actual term)
"Similar to Sonnet 27, Sonnet 28 ends comparably — in an unhappy state" - is there a need for a hyphen here? Seems a bit disjointed here. Could easily be read as just Similar to Sonnet 27, Sonnet 28 ends similarly in an unhappy state
Is there any need for the Original text section as the text is also in the table in the lead section? This section (though it is just the actual sonnet) is also unreferenced.
"Dympna Callaghan asserts that the sonnet" - who is this!?
It would be helpful if the Paraphrase could have more content in it, as currently it only comprises of a large quote from Callaghan
"Peter Hyland contends that" - who is this? An historian?

References edit

Toolserver picks up no dead links, so this passes

On hold edit

I support the fact that this article is for educational purposes and from the previous two Sonnets I have reviewed, I understand that Shakespearean articles take a different approach to Wikipedia and GANs. If all of the above can be addressed, then there is a possibility of this being promoted to GA. I'll leave this on hold for the standard seven days. Thanks! ☯ Jaguar ☯ 17:37, 1 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Close - not listed edit

I'm sorry but I'm going to have to close this due to inactivity. It has been over seven days and the article has been untouched. Please re-nominate once you're ready ☯ Jaguar ☯ 16:32, 7 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic