 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hauxiapterus edit
Am having a problem with the reference to the following sentence
- In the same paper describing this species, the species Huaxiapterus atavismus was also named.[1]
Unfortunately the link is dead. When I went to look for the reference the problems started;
- According to Acta Geologica Sinica [1] the 1996 volume only has 6 issues, the reference stating issue 9. Also the stated page number is outside the range of the six issues for that year.
- I can only find an abstract on Research Gate [2] and nowhere else (not an exhaustive search).
- There is a 2106 paper from Dr Lu in Acta Geologica Sinica [3] but with a completely different title.
- It does however reference a 2006 publication (Reference Lu 2006a in above paper) that has a closer title 'Pterosaurs from China'.
Can a subject-matter expert have a look at this and try to sort out whether the reference is valid or not? The ref is used on Huaxiapterus as well. Skullcinema (talk) 16:20, 10 June 2022 (UTC).
References
- ^ Lü, Junchang; Teng, Fangfang; Sun, Deyu; Shen, Caizhi; Li, Guoqing; Gao, Xia; Liu, Hanfeng (2016). "The toothless pterosaurs from China". Acta Geologica Sinica. 90 (9): 2513–2525.
Revision edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
So now the species have finally been reshuffled[4], which leaves us with a few issues to solve. Following that paper, we should merge Huaxiapterus as a synonym here, and split off Nemicolopterus as a nomen dubium. Huaxiadraco is a new genus based on H. corollatus (with H. benxiensis as a synonym), and S. dongi is monotypic (all other species being synonyms). Too early for these drastic changes? FunkMonk (talk) 23:02, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Support AFH (talk) 23:09, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- Looking at it the better part of a year later, have these proposed changes been accepted by researchers? SilverTiger12 (talk) 13:43, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- It would be wise to check the literature published since then to see if theres any support for the recovered positions. If there is, the changes should be uncontroversial and would have my support. The Morrison Man (talk) 19:30, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Palaeontology has been notified of this discussion. PrimalMustelid (talk) 22:16, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:25, 25 March 2023 (UTC)