Talk:Siege of Damascus (634)/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Pyrotec in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 10:41, 13 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 10:41, 13 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Initial comments

edit
After a quick couple of read throughs, this appears to be a reasonably-comprehensive, well-referenced article of about GA-standard. In passing, I think that the WP:Lead needs a bit of work done; but I normally leave the review of the lead until last, so I will delay any detailed comments on that until I've completed my review of the main body of the article.
I will now carry out a more detailed review. Pyrotec (talk) 20:31, 14 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • Background -
  • The siege -
  • Khalid's attack & Aftermath -

These two sections are generally compliant. Pyrotec (talk) 12:49, 17 January 2010 (UTC)Reply


Overall summary

edit

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Congratulations on the quality of the article, its now a GA. Pyrotec (talk) 12:59, 17 January 2010 (UTC)Reply