Talk:Shriya Saran/GA3
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Ashliveslove in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Ashliveslove (talk · contribs) 11:40, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
This is the third time this article is been nominated for GA. By checking its backlog and reviews from previous discussions regarding the failed GA's I think more time and detail revision will be needed. Any other reviewer can see the last backlog here. ASHUIND 11:50, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- Comments
- Have found that article is improved since its last nomination. Areas where it failed have been rewritten and expanded.
- Non-copyrighted images are present with proper captions.
- Problem
- Found few dead links and have marked them in article.
- Overall
- I'll be glad to provide it GA right on the way. Just waiting for the dead links to be removed. Want it to be clean when getting that green plus sign. ASHUIND 13:09, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Final Analysis edit
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- It is stable.
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Keep up the good quality of Article. Don't let it delisted.
Regards.
ASHUIND 14:26, 7 November 2011 (UTC)