Talk:Sherlock Holmes Baffled/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Bob Castle in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 13:25, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply


I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: None found

Linkrot: One dead link repaired.[1] –– Jezhotwells (talk) 13:32, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Checking against GA criteria

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    I made one minor copyedit.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    Can we have ISNs for the books, please?
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    I am going to pass this as GA status, but the artcile could be improved by adding ISBN numbers. –– Jezhotwells (talk)
Thanks very much! Will endeavour to add those ISBNs - might try putting the refs in template format as well. Bob talk 16:27, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply