Talk:She said, "Don't make others suffer for your personal hatred."/GA1

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 18:49, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

I'll be reviewing this article.Tintor2 (talk) 18:49, 2 March 2023 (UTC) GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)Reply

Lead.
  • The premise is kinda long. It deals with the introduction to the series, a background and the content of the episode. Maybe trim it a bit?
  • The second paragraph features about the making of the series but instead just the themes.
Plot
  • Rei Ayanami and Gendo lack an introduction.
Production
  • The image was drawn by Sadamoto right? Crediting him would be good.
Reception
  • The merchandising remains kinda vague. Is it possible to explore it?

@TeenAngels1234: That's all.Tintor2 (talk) 02:57, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Tintor2: Tried my best. Thank you for the review.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 11:14, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a. (reference section):  
    b. (citations to reliable sources):  
    c. (OR):  
    d. (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a. (major aspects):  
    b. (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):  
    b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/fail:  

(Criteria marked   are unassessed)

The article passes the 6 criteria:

  • It is well written and has the fictional information easy to understand.
  • Every part of the content is referenced.
  • It covers nearly everything about the episode (creation, themes,analysis, response)
  • It is written from a neutral point of view.

Good work.Tintor2 (talk) 14:00, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply