Talk:Sharptooth houndshark/GA1
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Yzx in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 23:50, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
- I'll review this shark. MathewTownsend (talk) 23:50, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
- Just a few notes: I enlarged the image of the shark slightly in order to see details better, but feel free to change back. Also (minor), the statement "Harmless to humans" does seem to be mentioned in ref 14 - however nothing in the article indicates otherwise and I may have missed the info in the ref.
- Did you mean "does not seem to be mentioned"? If so, the info is in the "threat to humans" box near the bottom by the IUCN status.
- I thought I read in one of the references that not that much is known about this shark, but I can't find it now. (Did I hallucinate?)
- That has been said, but it's such a relative thing and given the difficulty of doing the research there's probably only a dozen shark species total that I've seen described as "well-known".
- This is well written, nicely illustrated and clearly structured. Very informative about this shark.
GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose: clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:
- B. Complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. Prose: clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Provides references to all sources:
- B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. Provides references to all sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Main aspects are addressed:
- B. Remains focused:
- A. Main aspects are addressed:
- Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Very well done!
- Pass or Fail:
Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 12:37, 6 April 2012 (UTC)