Talk:Separation of powers in Australia
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Untitled
editwhat is the name of the doctrine
This is a highly unsatisfactory article written as if the constitutional solution of the American Revolution were relevant to Australia. All the constitutional input into Australia derived from the UK and the Australian Constitution was largely created by Australian versed in and familiar with the Westminster system. There was no American input. The domestication of the Australian Constitution by the Statute of Westminster (1931), which fornad the Imperial Parliament in London to make legislation applicable to Australia, is not alluded to. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.78.145.81 (talk) 19:22, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
This article is well below standard, and would fail an undergraduate essay question. It is inaccurate, out of date and expressed in clumsy language
Thelorikeet (talk) 04:29, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
German 2012
edit@Find bruce and Hut 8.5: "German 2012" might be this; it looks like it was published while an undergraduate, but was quoted here and in the WA parliament. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 11:20, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks, you may be right although wouldn't that make it "German 2006". It doesn't seem a particularly notable reference in any event. The article could be significantly improved. Find bruce (talk) 19:46, 10 April 2017 (UTC)