Talk:Sea shanty/GA2

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Paul Magnussen in topic Performance styles

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Oakley77 (talk · contribs) 03:17, 11 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Review edit

  1. Well-written:
  2. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (prose) Brilliantly written.  Pass
    (b) (MoS) This criteria has been followed.  Pass
  3. Verifiable with no original research:
  4. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (references) The majority of refs are books or articles, and refs are suitable and accurate.  Pass
    (b) (citations to reliable sources) Many useful and reliable citations can be found  Pass
    (c) (original research) Entirely original  Pass
  5. Broad in its coverage:
  6. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (major aspects) All major and vital points of the subject are covered.  Pass
    (b) (focused) Article is on track and stays on a train of thought.  Pass
  7. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  8. Notes Result
    Article has no hint of bias whatsoever.  Pass
  9. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  10. Notes Result
    No edit wars or disputes.  Pass
  11. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
  12. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) A pass here...  Pass
    (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) Yes  Pass

Result edit

Result Notes
 Pass This article is ready to be a GA!

Oakley77 (talk) 17:21, 11 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Discussion edit

I will be reviewing this for a bit, but during that time, please feel free to comment and help make this article a GA one. I also will be completing the review at intervals, so if you see the review half-done, be aware it will be completed soon. Thanks for the comments and input! Oakley77 (talk) 03:17, 11 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Many thanks for your prompt assessment! I also appreciate your constructive edits. Have a great day,DrBaldhead (talk) 20:39, 11 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Shanty in Polish edit

A shanty in Polish is szanta, not szanty. Szanty is the form of plural (a shanty = szanta, shanties = szanty). 31.11.242.231 (talk) 17:51, 27 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Performance styles edit

'Still other performers come to shanties from backgrounds in pop, rock, or theatrical music, and perform in what may be called a "contemporary" style'.

This sentence seems confusing: "contemporary" in the context of shanties conveys 19th century to me. If "modern" is what is meant, wouldn't that word be better? The ambiguity of "contemporary" is vexatious when several periods are being referred to. Paul Magnussen (talk) 17:10, 16 April 2014 (UTC)Reply