It seems that we agree that Image:Scrivener Dam Canberra-01JAC.jpg I added to the article, is the better image of the dam. Personally, I tend to add this to the infobox. -- User:Docu 10:25, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- No one has agreed? Image:Scrivener Dam Canberra-01JAC.jpg is over exposed (and something photoshop will not fix), only partly shows the dam wall were as File:Scrivener Dam.jpg shows the whole dam wall with the lake in view and also fits nicely in the infobox. Bidgee (talk) 10:30, 2 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
- Ok, I must have misread your edit summary. The advantage of Image:Scrivener Dam Canberra-01JAC.jpg is that it shows more of the dam than File:Scrivener Dam.jpg. The quality of the first image is debatable, but the dam section on File:Scrivener Dam.jpg is in the shade. In addition, File:Scrivener Dam.jpg is already used in other articles. Ideally we would have a version of File:Scrivener Dam.jpg taken from a further distance. (Full disclosure: neither was taken by me). -- User:Docu
- I disagree. The Dam is longer then what Image:Scrivener Dam Canberra-01JAC.jpg shows only a small part of the dam. It's not possible to get a photo unless you go into the river as the Zoo and trees prevent a better view from the west (were this was taken) and to the east there is a fence (which can bee seen in the panorama.) but could be possible to access further down. I've lightened the panorama up. Bidgee (talk) 11:20, 2 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=logo}
