Talk:Scientific evidence (law)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Scientific evidence (law) redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | This article was nominated for merging with Expert witness on July 14, 2011. The result of the discussion was Merge. |
 | The contents of the Scientific evidence (law) page were merged into Expert witness on September 11, 2014 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Proposed move to scientific evidence (law)
editSince this article deals with scientific evidence in the legal field, it is distinct from scientific evidence established in the practice of the scientific method. Therefore I propose moving the article title to Scientific evidence (law). --Blainster 05:34, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
I agree. takethemud 09:55, 23 April 2006 (UTC)takethemud
I agree. This is what legally qualifies as "scientific evidence", not what scientifically qualifies as evidence.--Zachblume 20:56, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
I have moved it--Zachblume 21:15, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Need for Edit
editThis article is sorely in need of major overhaul. It looks like somebody cut-and-pasted their noted from their Evidence class onto the Wiki, complete with abbreviations and the subjective observations of themselves or the professor. I will work on this when I get time.