This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
The contents of the Scene.org Awards page were merged into Scene.org on 26 June 2017 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history.
Latest comment: 18 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Since the list is in descending order, new entries will come on top, which means one would need to move the links upwards every time a new year is added. I know it's not really according to WP:MOS but maybe in lists it would make sense to have a tad more redundant links instead of "proper" linking randomly on the page somewhere? // Gargaj 21:32, 27 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
Well, the "proper" thing to do would be to remove redundant links as you're (re-)adding them at the top of the section. Shouldn't be too big a pain if you're only updating the section once a year. There are already enough red links as it is.. maybe it's time to get subjective and take out a few you wouldn't/shouldn't add as articles (*coughshitfacedclownscough*). --Vossanova 01:47, 28 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
Then again e.g. Grammy Award for Best Metal Performance has redundant links (obviously no red ones). I feel that linking every group on every occasion is the best solution; the real question might be to have or not to have redlinks. // Gargaj 11:44, 28 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
I myself hate redlinks. If you feel it's better to repeat links, I won't put up a fight, but those links better be valid or at least notable enough to be so. The fewer links, the cleaner the list. --Vossanova 20:39, 28 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
I removed all redlinks and repeated all blue ones. Deal? :) //Gargaj 22:29, 28 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
