Talk:Scary Godmother: Halloween Spooktakular/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by HumanxAnthro in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 23:27, 27 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments later in the week. Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk? 23:27, 27 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! HumanxAnthro (talk) 01:49, 28 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead edit

  • Using Amazon as a reference doesn't seem like a good choice per WP:AMAZON. I suggest replacing it with this.
  • As the two references after "first book" are already in #Background_and_development, they're not necessary for the lead.
  • Everything else looks good.

Plot edit

  • "Katie, Bert and Daryl" → "Katie, Bert, and Daryl"
  • "Bert, Daryl and Katie" → "Bert, Daryl, and Katie"
  • "He declares himself the "leader" out of nowhere by winning a rock, paper, scissors game." → "He declares himself the "leader" after winning a rock, paper, scissors game."

Background and development edit

  • "US$350,000" → "$350,000"
  • "vice president Kim Dent Wilder" → "Mainframe vice president Kim Dent Wilder"
  • "a TV series" → "a television series"

Production edit

Workflow edit

  • In the last paragraph of this section, remove the last part of the quote "and generally bugged everyone several times a week with my yammering phone calls" as it seems unnecessary, and add an [and] in-between "designed sets, painted backgrounds".

Casting edit

  • This section looks good.

Animation edit

Visual style edit

  • This section also looks good.

Release edit

  • This reference in the article says the film went to Region 1 DVD on September 3, not September 8. Also, change this in the lead.
  • "Germany and Italy" → "Germany, and Italy"

Reception edit

Overview edit

GAN table edit

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  

Notes edit