Talk:Scanning SQUID microscopy
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Klbrain in topic Merge content from Scanning SQUID microscope?
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | The contents of the Scanning SQUID microscope page were merged into Scanning SQUID microscopy on 3 January 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Merge content from Scanning SQUID microscope?
editThe two articles are very similar in content and there isn't much to distinguish between microscopy and microscope, so I believe that they should be merged. However, do we want to call the article 'Scanning SQUID microscope' or 'Scanning SQUID microscopy'? -- AquaDTRS (talk) 19:49, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Support the merge (overlap), and could live with either title, but I prefer Scanning SQUID microscopy as the application is somewhat more likely to be of interested than the details of the machine itself (although both should certainly be covered in the article!). It also fits with precedents such as Confocal microscopy, Fluorescence-lifetime imaging microscopy, Two-photon excitation microscopy ... but admittedly not with Electron microscope. Klbrain (talk) 19:34, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
