Talk:Saturdays of Thunder/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

After reading the article, I concluded that,

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

This might be a fast review, but the article only took me 30 minutes from start to finish. I found no major problems in the article, so I conclude this review as passed. :) —Terrence and Phillip 07:57, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for taking a look. Theleftorium 08:55, 20 September 2009 (UTC)