Talk:Sarvam/GA1
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Jezhotwells in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 14:33, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
| Toolbox |
|---|
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Checking against GA criteria
edit- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS): 
- Very poorly written throughout, this article requires a thorough copy edit for grammar, tense, style, clarity and readability. Nowhere near GA standard.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- One dead link has been tagged.
- What makes Behindwoods a reliable source? I can find no statement of editorial policy or evidence that the site is regarded as a reliable source by other quality sources.
- Ayngaran, as a film distributor is not a reliable source, rather a primary source. Use with care
- Kollywood today looks like a wiki to me, not a reliable source.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- OK, the main point is that this is very poorly written. There is also some doubtful sourcing. I cannot complete the review until the article is written in good clear English. After advising the nominator to get submissions copy-edited, they asked me to carry on reviewing, so I have done so, but if it cannot be brought up to standard in seven days, I shall fail the nomination. On hold until 11 April. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 15:02, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- As the nominator has removed the nomination from the list at WP:GAN, i shall close this review as not listed. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 16:10, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
