Talk:Sara Northrup Hollister/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

I shall be reviewing this page against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:32, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Quick fail criteria assessment

1. The article completely lacks reliable sources – see Wikipedia:Verifiability.

   • 

2. The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way – see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.

   • 

3. There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.

   • 

4. The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.

   • 

5. The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.

   • 

Passes when checked against quick fail criteria, on to substantive review. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:42, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose):

   • Lead: ...was the second wife of L. Ron Hubbard, from 1946-1951, and of Miles Hollister from 1951 to her death in 1997. Clarity - was she the second wife of Hollister as well?Y

   b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references):

   • Adequately referenced. I assume good faith as there no online sources.

   b (citations to reliable sources):

   • All sources appear reliable

   c (OR):

3. It is broad in its scope.

   a (major aspects):

   b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):

   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   • One minor concern with the lead, on hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:04, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Only GA Hold concern appears to have been a minor grammar issue. Fixed [1]. Cirt (talk) 20:27, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

That is possibly less precise, though - if she was his 2nd wife as well, then the article may as well say so. --Tango (talk) 23:05, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

OK, my concern has been fixed the sentence is clear now. Passing as a Good Article, Congratulations and thanks for your hard work. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:20, 13 September 2009 (UTC)