Talk:Sako Chivitchian/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 17:35, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:39, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:39, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   The lead contains material which is not mentioned in the body of the article, e.g. birth in Armenia and immigration to the US. See WP:LEAD.

   Stray sentences need consolidating into paragraphs.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Referenced ok, references appear reliable enough.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   He immigrated to the United States of America When?

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   No images used.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   On Hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:14, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

   THe only edit made to this article since the review has been the addition of an EL, so as no attempt has been made to address the points above, I am failing this nomination. Jezhotwells (talk)