Talk:Saint-Louis-du-Louvre/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 19:48, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

I'll take another look at it tomorrow! Zwerg Nase (talk) 19:48, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

To get back to the issues raised in the first review:

• Google books: this template should help. But I didn't really mean that, I meant the pages around here, where I often need to follow another link to get to what you point to (such as with Paul-Henri Marron in ref #10).
• I still have a small problem with ref #11: The source says that the building was demolished in 1811 but that parts remained until 1850, being replaced with the Denon Wing. By clicking through some pages, I found that that is actually is a part of the Louvre Palace. Maybe you can clarify that in the prose, so that it matches better to the source?
• You wikilinked Louvre Palace in the lead, but you should link it at the first mention in the content body as well.
• The first paragraph of Saint-Louis-du-Louvre should not be without an inline citation.

Again, seven days to take care of the issues. Zwerg Nase (talk) 11:53, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

I've made appropriate edits. Thanks for the tip on the Google Books template. I haven't found a way to deal with the issue of the l'Oratoire du Louve pages. I still want to use that reference because it provides some unique information. I have added one non-web reference taken from the French Wikipedia page for Marron that is the source of some of that sentence.Djkeddie (talk) 23:50, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

It's a pass now, congratulations :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:22, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

I will however list it under Art and architecture, not World History. Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:27, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Many thanks, having another person look at an article is invaluable.Djkeddie (talk) 22:25, 13 August 2015 (UTC)