Talk:Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency (2012)

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Cdogsimmons

This article lacks notability. I am proposing it for deletion.

--Andy0093 (talk) 15:46, 13 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

I couldn't disagree more. This case, heard by the U.S. Supreme Court yesterday, affects the Constitutional right of property owners to build a home on their land, as well as the Due Process rights of property owners to go to court and sue the EPA when the agency issues a "Compliance Order" prohibiting development on land that the EPA, in its sole discretion, deems to be "wetlands". This is an important property-rights case. Captain Quirk (talk) 11:06, 10 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
I agree with Captain Quirk. It's an important case and a basic Google search would show numerous news articles indicating notability. Of course, in case this article were nominated for deletion via WP:AFD, I am fairly certain it would result in a speedy keep. But why go through the trouble? I encourage anyone who reads this to help improve all U.S. Supreme Court case articles (check out Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases).--Cdogsimmons (talk) 01:05, 4 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Infobox

edit

I've added the SCOTUS infobox but I'm not sure about some of the finer details such as the citation numbers, so I've left it hidden until I can find those. However, if someone else wants to fill them in, go right ahead. --Kevin W./TalkCFB uniforms/Talk 01:47, 22 March 2012 (UTC)Reply