 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
"A BioPower flexible-fuel variant capable of running on gasohol mixtures containing as much as 85% ethanol (E85) will become available in 2006. "
Actually it has been available for at least two years now. Is the sentence referring to the American market? Either way it should be corrected.
B212 edit
This part makes no sense...the engine is N/A but the article states it makes better power at higher boost levels???
Please tell me i am just reading this wrong.
B203 edit
There is no mention of the B203 derivative which is in the 900NG and was the predecsor of the B204 Ianguy (talk) 09:52, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
B205/B235 edit
The info about turbochargers is not entirely correct, and totally unsourced. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.227.129.148 (talk) 23:59, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
AKA edit
Fam III or Family III engine, VX1NG (talk) 19:39, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
successor edit
There seem to be contradicting information regarding the fate of the H engine. According to several sources, BAIC still uses it, and has been doing so in the form of knock down kits until 2013 (German Wikipedia). That would imho mean that the engine was still produced in Sweden until 2013, and later on, wherever (?!). I also heard that the Ecotec engines do not use the trionic, but I am not sure about this.
Funny that there apparently is no information on where the H engine has been built since.
Thyl Engelhardt 87.190.243.142 (talk) 05:32, 10 June 2015 (UTC)