Talk:SSPX Resistance
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Veverve in topic I would like to bring back this article with additional secondary sources
 | This orphaned talk page, subpage, image page, or similar is not eligible for speedy deletion under CSD G8 as it has been asserted to be useful to Wikipedia. If you believe it should be deleted, please nominate it on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion. |
I would like to bring back this article with additional secondary sources edit
Hello @Veverve: @Daniel:
In July the article SSPX Resistance was deleted on the grounds that it didn't contain enough secondary sources. Since that deletion, the group has become the topic of discussion in the Irish national news media, adding to the availability of secondary sources. In addition to this, it seems that the group was the subject of discussion in the British news media in 2017. I believe that by using those sources, I could bring the article up to standards. Would it be possible to get a copy of the article at the time of deletion? I can use that as the basis and add in content from the secondary sources.
Regards, CeltBrowne (talk) 18:04, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- @CeltBrowne: The only group which received any coverage in Irish media is a group depending on Bishop Williamson, which so happens to be called "SSPX Resistance". Those article do not speak about a current within the SSPX, but of an independent, non-SSPX group headed by Williamson. Those news are from 2019, way before the deletion. Finally, the article was relying mostly on primary sources, with no RS clearly defining the subject the article was supposed to be about. Therefore, I strongly believe the article should not be restored, since - if I remember correctly - there is nothing to salvage from the deleted article. You can read my deletion request for more details.
- You can have a look at Wikipedia:Deletion review if you still want to challenge the deletion. Veverve (talk) 19:22, 10 October 2021 (UTC)