Talk:SM UB-43/GA1
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Wandalstouring in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- References needed:
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (references):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comment: I don't like the system for notes. It's too complicated for other editors to change without causing errors. Take a look at cref. Wandalstouring (talk) 15:38, 22 February 2009 (UTC)