Talk:SM U-3 (Austria-Hungary)/GA1

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Jackyd101 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the Wikipedia:good article criteria, with a suggestion for future development. This is not required to achieve GA standard, but might help in future A-class or FAC review process.--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:43, 30 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

  • It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  • It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  • It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  • It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation):   b (all significant views):  
  • It is stable.
     
  • It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned):   b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):   c (non-free images have fair use rationales):  
No images, although if one could be found it would improve things.--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:43, 30 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
  • Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:  

Additonal comments

edit
  • Only a minor thing, but it might be interesting to have some more information on the unsuccessful cruises made by U-3 in 1914-15 before the commander was changed. It might also be good to comment on this change, is there any known reason for it (i.e. a lack of aggression by the previous commander). In any case, the early patrols and the change in command could be mentioned in the text.--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:43, 30 November 2008 (UTC)Reply