Talk:SM U-1 (Austria-Hungary)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the Wikipedia:good article criteria, with suggestions for future development. These are not required to achieve GA standard, but they might help in future A-class or FAC review process.

• It is reasonably well written.

  a (prose): b (MoS):

• It is factually accurate and verifiable.

  a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

• It is broad in its coverage.

  a (major aspects): b (focused):

• It follows the neutral point of view policy.

  a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

• It is stable.

  

• It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

  a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

• Overall:

  a Pass/Fail:

Additonal comments

• The link to Brioni does not go where you intended.
  • Whoops. I've fixed that so the link points to Brioni Island. — Bellhalla (talk) 18:40, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
• For an article of this size, the lead is longer than is normal and could be summarised more consisely. However, this is not a significant problem and is only a matter of taste.
  • I tightened up the lead a bit so that it's more in line with the length of the article. Thanks again for the suggestions. — Bellhalla (talk) 18:53, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Thankyou and congratulations, an excellent addition to Wikipedia:Good Articles. All the best.--Jackyd101 (talk) 17:54, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for taking the time to review the article. — Bellhalla (talk) 18:40, 25 November 2008 (UTC)