Talk:SMS Stralsund/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Parsecboy in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 05:11, 30 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    This is awkward: a group of a light cruiser and sixteen British destroyers. Maybe "a group of 16 British..." Perhaps reinforced rather than joined? were joined by the battlecruisers A typo, I presume? 31 May – 1916 As is this: 2 February January 1918,
    All fixed - mostly the results of rewriting sentences halfway through.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
    Country or state of publication in Scheer, Staff and Halpern. And delete the ltd from Cassell in Scheer.
    All fixed.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

I hope the two of you don't mind me commenting. Based on HRS volume 7 MisterBee1966 (talk) 19:45, 30 December 2011 (UTC)Reply