Talk:SMS Preussen (1903)/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Jim Sweeney in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 00:54, 22 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  


Comments

edit
  1. The text has - eighteen 8.8 cm (3.45 in) SK L/35 quick-firing guns and the inf box - 14 × 8.8 cm (3.5 in) guns (bet this does not crop up again)
  2. The footnote could use a cite
  3. Tarrant, V. E in the bibliography could use the publishers location added

--Jim Sweeney (talk) 01:02, 22 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

All fixed. You know, you make one little mistake in one infobox and then copy it over to the other four articles...thanks for catching those :) Parsecboy (talk) 11:14, 22 September 2010 (UTC)Reply