Talk:SMS Kaiser Max (1875)/GA1

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Krishna Chaitanya Velaga in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 11:53, 22 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Well constructed, will get back shortly. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:53, 22 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Section 1

edit
  • Para 1; The sentence She had a crew of 400 officers and men is a bit confusing. A reader may get an idea that it had 400 officers alone, and also men not including in these 400. Please correct this.
    • This is a pretty standard way to write this, and there's no good way to change it to fix what you suggest. See for instance FAs like Japanese aircraft carrier Shinano.

Section 2

edit
  • Para 3; The sentence The ship's fate after entering Yugoslav service was abruptly cut with a full stop, not giving a information about the fate. Instead of a full stop, a semi colon (;) would help.
    • Good catch, fixed.

Lead

edit
  • I suggest replacing the word "purportedly" with its synonym, because most of the standard dictionaries don't have a definition /meaning for the word.
    • This is a common word - I don't know where you looked, but it's in Merriam-Webster, the Cambridge Dictionary, and Dictionary.com (the only three I checked, surely its in others).

All good, address these suggestions and will be good to go. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 06:01, 24 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your review. Parsecboy (talk) 09:54, 26 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:20, 26 September 2016 (UTC)Reply