Talk:SMS Königsberg (1915)/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Parsecboy in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 14:53, 26 October 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteriaReply

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    Link to 88mm flak gun article, sister/sister ship. Mines is duplicated.
    Links added - as far as I can tell, naval mine is only linked once. Parsecboy (talk) 19:10, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
    Sorry, my fault; I should have said that mines appear twice in the infobox.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:59, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
    No worries, fixed now. Parsecboy (talk) 20:09, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
    Is a picture available?
    Added a photo of Karlsruhe
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: