Talk:SMS Graudenz/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Parsecboy in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MisterBee1966 (talk · contribs) 10:43, 5 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
  • I assume that no image is available?
  • Can you add a footnote that the correct spelling of "Prinzess Wilhelm" in its native language is "Prinzeß Wilhelm". I love our ß
  • You used to have a footnote explaining what Ersatz stands for. The link requires a lot of reading and a sublement note would help
  • christened by mayor Dr. Kühnast HRS volume 3 page 245
  • do you want to know the commanding officers? Some of them achieved admiral rank
    • Added notes on Prinzeß and Ersatz, and a line on the christening. Sure, if you have the commanders and their dates of service I can work them into the article. Parsecboy (talk) 12:38, 10 January 2012 (UTC)Reply