Talk:Sığnaq

Azerbaijan Low‑importance

	Azerbaijan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Azerbaijan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Azerbaijan-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AzerbaijanWikipedia:WikiProject AzerbaijanTemplate:WikiProject AzerbaijanAzerbaijan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Armenia Low‑importance

	Sığnaq is within the scope of WikiProject Armenia, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to Armenia and Armenians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.ArmeniaWikipedia:WikiProject ArmeniaTemplate:WikiProject ArmeniaArmenian articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Artsakh

	Sığnaq is within the scope of WikiProject Artsakh, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to Artsakh and Artsakhians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.ArtsakhWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsakhTemplate:WikiProject ArtsakhArtsakh articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

History edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There are two points of note here:

One is the claim Armenian forces took the region, rather than simply controlled or administered it. Despite being reverting it is not clear if this is in dispute. If there is no dispute please don't mass-revert. Second is describing the capture of the village as a recapture. Capture is an appropriate term that describes what has happened. We should use clear unambiguous language, which "capture" is. Recapture implies either that the region was previously captured by the enemy (OED) or to capture again (Meriam Webster). Neither of these demonstrably happened. We shouldn't be using the term "recapture" as a catch-all term for when secessionist state loses territory Maidyouneed (talk) 18:32, 4 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

1st claim is in dispute. It was controlled/administred by Azerbaijan SSR, direct precursor of Azerbaijan republic. It was then taken by self-proclaimed NKR.

2nd claim is in dispute. The self-proclaimed "Secessionist state" in question is not legitamate, it was not there to begin with, it took the territory in question in opposition to local and international law. It captured the territory which by local and international jurisdiction is Azerbaijani, which was later recaptured.

This is a non-issue. I suggest we get a 3rd party opinion. - Creffel (talk) 20:14, 4 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic