Talk:RxAll

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Celestina007 in topic Contesting deletion

Contesting deletion edit

Firstly, I want every editors and contributors in the house to know that every articles on Wikipedia is a work in progress and Wikipedia itself is a vision in motion. In order words, there is no perfect or complete article default of editing on Wikipedia. Thousand of articles is being work upon daily --- no perfect articles!

Secondly, concerning the proposed deletion of this article, I will not want it to be deleted, not for any wrong motive, but for the expansion and development of the encyclopedia community. Instead, it should be improve and any unwanted or poor elements contained in the article should be remove and the article should be continually work upon.

Thirdly, as editors, when we come across any newly created or young article, what should come to mind first, is how to fixed the annormaliy, not putting a deletion template straight away. It help none! And encourages none!

Lastly, everyone is welcome to do justice as deem fit to the article. But, as for me, this is my first and last response to this issue. Regards, Abiodun Ayobami (talk) 14:47, 29 January 2020 (UTC) :@Celestina007:Reply

@Abiodun Ayobami, you have a history of creating articles you have an obvious WP:COI with & if I’m not mistaken on one of your articles titled Fred Martins, (which even falls short of WP:GNG and possesses only bare notability) you did not disclose your COI with the article’s subject until a Nigerian editor advised & forced you to. Secondly it is not my duty to provide reliable sources for your articles as an article creator you are tasked with that duty, what my duty is however is to ensure that before tagging any article with any deletion related tag I have checked & not found any RS (in relation to GNG) substanting notability claims in the article prior performing deletion related actions. It is as though you feel because we both currently reside in Nigeria, I am to be lenient with your articles if that was the case, Wikipedia would not have its stellar reputation it currently possesses, it would be another LinkedIn.Celestina007 (talk) 15:46, 29 January 2020 (UTC)Reply