Talk:Russian ironclad Petropavlovsk/GA1
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Sturmvogel 66 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: QatarStarsLeague (talk · contribs) 22:29, 30 June 2013 (UTC) Review will commence in a few days. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 22:29, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Lead & Infobox
editUnless it is mentioned within your reference texts, how are you sure the vessel was named for the siege of Petropavlosk and not Petropavlosk? I assume it is mentioned in the given source?
- See the first sentence of the Construction and service section.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:12, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, but I was/am asking if you can confirm within your sources that the moniker is topical to the siege, as opposed to the city. As I said, I assume you can? QatarStarsLeague (talk) 02:01, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, it's named for the siege.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:03, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, but I was/am asking if you can confirm within your sources that the moniker is topical to the siege, as opposed to the city. As I said, I assume you can? QatarStarsLeague (talk) 02:01, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Description
editFine here.
Construction and service
editI know in most of your previous articles, you mention the location of the ship's scrapping. Is it not possible to in this article? QatarStarsLeague (talk) 14:53, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
- I don't know for sure, but it was probably Saint Petersburg. But that's just my guess.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:13, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
- If you cannot source this information, that is fine. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 02:02, 2 July 2013 (UTC)