Talk:Rovers (Australia)

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Bduke in topic Oldest crew

The article appears very Victoria-based, and not representative of Rovering across Australia.

Proposed merge edit

In May it was proposed that Mafeking Rover Park, Rover Motorsport and Mudbash be merged to Scouting in Victoria. There is a suggestion on Talk:Scouting in Victoria that would be better merged here. I have therefore moved the merge tags to suggest the merge to here, but I suggest that the debate continues at Talk:Scouting in Victoria#Merge of three Rover articles - Mafeking Rover Park, Rover Motorsport and Mudbash. --Bduke 00:34, 4 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Merge from Victorian Branch Rover Council edit

The council itself is not notable. It should be moved to the Rovers section article because the content is the same for every branch. :: maelgwn :: talk 13:44, 4 June 2007 (UTC) SupportReply

  • Support Rlevse 17:19, 8 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • Support and generalize to cover all branches. --Bduke 00:21, 9 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Oppose

I have completed the merge. The article now needs some examples of BRC activities in States other than Victoria and a tidy up when the other merge proposals are completed. --Bduke 23:44, 22 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Merge of Baden-Powell Award edit

It is proposed that this article be merged here. Although the article is not a stub, the material needs to be shortened into a tighter form and the article does have cleanup tags on it. The Rovers (Australia) article is not that long and has quite a bit of material on rather specific things. It would balance it out to have a section on the major award of the section. My only doubt is that I believe that the Baden-Powell Award is, or was, an award in Rovers in countries other than Australia (e.g. if memory serves me right, in UK when Rovers was a section), but the article does not mention this. In any event, if this award is used elsewhere it would have different criteria and could be mentioned elsewhere. --Bduke 23:08, 20 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Support merge.

  • As above. --Bduke 23:08, 20 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • support per nom. Chris 23:25, 20 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • support - i removed the content because it was a copyvio from [1]. This is a major part of Rovering and so should be treated in the rovers australia article. It is not notable enough for it's own artilcle. :: maelgwntalk 06:05, 22 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Oppose merge.

Now the copyvio has been removed the article says what Rovers (Australia) says. I'm closing this discussion and making it a redirect. --Bduke 07:28, 22 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi. It is awarded in several countries where Rovers still exist. Perhaps having it link just to Australia is a problem, so could this section not be moved to the page on Rover Scouts in general rather than the page just on the Australian section? DiverScout (talk) 14:34, 13 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Although the award shares the same name across several NSOs, I suspect that the requirements are very different. The universal Rover article should have content on the award, but specifics should be in the NSO or section articles. --—— Gadget850 (Ed) talk - 15:48, 13 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Our version is essentially the same as the first Australian option. Problem is that anyone searching for the award is redirected straight to Rovers Australia, giving the wrong impression that it's an Australian award. Being as it is an internationally recognised award, I think that this award deserves its own page again. It should not be hard to create something equal to the Queen's Scout page and I'm happy to research and write it. DiverScout (talk) 18:51, 13 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

MARB Committee edit

What do the initials "MARB" stand for? This article is supposed to be understandable to folks outside the organisation. I have spelt out RRC and BRC for clarity, but I have no idea what MARB means. --Bduke (talk) 22:07, 18 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Melbourne Area Rover Ball :: maelgwn - talk 00:48, 19 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Well, well, thanks for that. I see you added it to the article. Since it is only Victoria, is it worth having in the article? --Bduke (talk) 11:05, 19 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Yes - the article is very Victoria based (probably because they have the most members *-)) ive looked at this section a wee bit. :: maelgwn - talk 12:20, 19 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Oldest crew edit

The section below was, quite correctly, removed from the general article on Rovers. It should be on this article, but it needs referencing and it needs rewriting:

"Most importantly with regards to Australian Rovering, 1st Epping Rover Crew in Sydney North Region, New South Wales is the WORLD’S oldest continually operating Rover Crew. Many Crews worldwide started befor 1st Epping but these Crews have closed down or suspended operations for a period of years."

Removing POV and the obvious, it might read:

"1st Epping Rover Crew in Sydney North Region, New South Wales is the oldest continually operating Rover Crew in the World." --Bduke (Discussion) 22:07, 12 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
Agree— definitely needs a reference. We already have a lot of unsourced statements in Oldest Scout Groups. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 22:15, 12 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
Just found that they claim this at here, but we need a better source. --Bduke (Discussion) 22:17, 12 July 2009 (UTC)Reply