Talk:Roman–Seleucid war/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cplakidas (talk · contribs) 19:08, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Will gladly take this on, in the next few days. Constantine ✍ 19:08, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   c. (OR):

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   b. (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

@Cplakidas: Thank you for taking this up for a review.Catlemur (talk) 02:23, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

@Cplakidas: With all due respect it has now been over 2 months since you began this review. Do you plan to actually carry it out? If not feel free to fail it so I can renominate it.--Catlemur (talk) 18:49, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

@Catlemur: my sincere apologies, real life has become quite demanding of late. Best of luck with the renomination. Constantine ✍ 08:46, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.