Talk:Rolls-Royce Trent 900

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

Airbus A380 Failure

edit

A Trent 900 suffered a failure today on an Airbus A380. Judging from the photo in the news stories such as this one, my guess is that the engine threw an HPT or LPT blade, but we'll wait and see what the official word is. This incident may warrent a mention in the article if RR takes any action, like grounding the engine or redesigning a part, but I think we can wait and see before posting anything. -SidewinderX (talk) 11:52, 4 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I read that this morning as well, grounding the Qantas fleet is a fairly notable action. As you say we don't know what caused it yet so we should hang on (it may take a while to determine the cause).Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 12:09, 4 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Yup, I agree. Btw, seems like they got lucky that it threw whatever failed outboard of the cabin... -SidewinderX (talk) 12:57, 4 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
I saw the AfD on the incident, only you noted that the problem was with the engine, not the aircraft. The incident has been noted in the A380 article and when we better know what the cause was we can move some of the info over here (assuming that it wasn't a birdstrike, FOD or something similar). It looks like the failure was contained (as it is designed and tested to do) even if it did loose some cowling panels. Speculating on the cause would be just that at the moment. Cheers Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 13:04, 4 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
The damage was not contained. A portion of the disk was found in Indonesia. You can see the turbine outer casing is gone on the widely distributed pictures in the media. There are also pictures of a puncture to the wing.173.8.206.125 (talk) 18:49, 8 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

What specifically caused the bearing box to fail? Putting it differently, what is different about the new upgraded bearing boxes from the old faulty ones? Is it a sealing problem? Was the seal redesigned to prevent leakage? --Westwind273 (talk) 23:18, 14 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Does anyone know if all the speculation on Qantas cost cutting on maintenance has anything to do with the failure?

60.240.14.140 (talk) 12:15, 25 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

needs updated

edit

Rolls Royce no longer has the market share on A380. PW/GE has 144 Order verse 84 for RR. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.64.176.178 (talk) 08:56, 8 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Engine issues after Qantas engine fire

edit

It seems that the article info on the engine fire has grown quite a lot here. Although I welcome in depth coverage, we have an article specifically on the problem (with the confusing name Qantas Flight 32, as it is as much about the aftermath as on the flight itslelf, but that is the naming convention the aircrash people don't wish to change) also detailing the events afterwards. Shall I trim the section here down to a single paragraph? L.tak (talk) 21:41, 13 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Rolls-Royce Trent 900. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:50, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply