Talk:Roland GS

Latest comment: 10 years ago by 61.144.19.82 in topic the "history" part is completely wrong

Sound Canvas module lists edit

This list of modules in the article overlaps with the list in Roland Sound Canvas. As individual articles are created, both lists should be linked to them. --HunterZ 00:59, 7 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Agree. Generally, it should be a list of Roland sampling equipment, that would have marks what standards does that particular sound card, module or synth supports. It would cover 100% of needs of both articles. --GreyCat

"leverages" ? edit

The following statement makes no sense: GS leverages some of the criticism

This sounds like something a suit would write for a business presentation. I don't think wikipedia is concerned with business synergies and right-sizing. Less obtuse wording would be more understandable. DMahalko (talk) 00:42, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

the "history" part is completely wrong edit

GS was created before GM, and GM is based on cutting down GS to make it easier for various manufacturers(especially smaller ones) to maintain compatibility. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.144.19.82 (talk) 01:37, 10 January 2014 (UTC)Reply