Talk:Rock in Opposition

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Progressive Rock, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Progressive rock on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Progressive RockWikipedia:WikiProject Progressive RockTemplate:WikiProject Progressive RockProgressive rock articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Music/Music genres task force Start‑class

	Music portal Rock in Opposition is within the scope of the Music genres task force of the Music project, a user driven attempt to clean up and standardize music genre articles on Wikipedia. Please visit the task force guidelines page for ideas on how to structure a genre article and help us assess and improve genre articles to good article status.Music/Music genres task forceWikipedia:WikiProject Music/Music genres task forceTemplate:WikiProject Music/Music genres task forcemusic genre articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Redirect

I've created a redirect-link to this page from Rock in opposition --Bruce1ee 08:37, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

List of bands too long?

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

The list of bands in the "RIO as a genre" section is getting a bit long now. I believe it should only include a selection of prominent bands operating within this "genre". A suggestion for starters is that all red-linked bands be removed. Does anyone have any objections to this? --Bruce1ee^talk 09:29, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

As no objections have been raised, I've removed all red-linked bands from the "RIO as a genre" section. --Bruce1ee^talk 08:40, 16 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic