Talk:Robotron: 2084/GA1
Latest comment: 15 years ago by MuZemike in topic GA Review
 | This is an archive of a previous GA nomination. The results of the nomination were that the article has passed the Good article criteria. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you disagree with this article's review, the article can be nominated for Good article reassessment. |
GA Review
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- Just two things:
- A. Prose quality:
- Defeating all the robots on the screen brings a more difficult wave; a cycle which continues until the character is defeated and player depletes extra attempts to continue the game.
- Doesn't flow very well, especially "brings a more difficult wave" and "player depletes extra attempts to continue the game". Suggest a rewrite such as "...takes the player to a more difficult wave" for the first part and "...the player loses all lives". Another suggestion would be to explain that players lose a life if hit be a robot or object, and the game ends when players have lost all their lives.
- The last two paragraphs in the Development section are both a tad long. I suggest splitting those last two into three or four smaller paragraphs for better readability.
- Defeating all the robots on the screen brings a more difficult wave; a cycle which continues until the character is defeated and player depletes extra attempts to continue the game.
- B. MoS compliance:
- References check out using refToolbar. External links all check out here.
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- Very well covered.
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Good usage of captions.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Criteria 3 through 6 look very good so far. Combing through the content to see if it meets 1 and 2 is in progress and, due to the length of the article, may take some time. MuZemike 21:56, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
- Review placed on hold to address the two issues I mentioned above in 1a. MuZemike 17:31, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
I believe I've addressed the prose issues you brought up. Please let me know if there is anything else. (Guyinblack25 talk 23:59, 17 April 2009 (UTC))
- Looks good. It passes. MuZemike 00:42, 18 April 2009 (UTC)