Talk:Mirage Men

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mirage Men. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140127050932/http://canberrafilmfestival.com.au/films/mirage-men to http://www.canberrafilmfestival.com.au/films/mirage-men
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.constablerobinson.com/?section=books&book=mirage_men_9781845298579_paperback

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:31, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

WP:NPOV severe violation(s)?

Ok. To start, IMDb has a collective rating of 6.3 out of 10 with 645 ratings. That's pretty negative. It's also biased towards the film itself, only including positive reviews. It also states the following as a fact (which I am fairly certain WP's position on the stuff is it's not true):

"Mirage Men is about how the US government used mythology to cover up their advanced technology." Perhaps something along the lines of, "Mirage Men is a documentary covering various conspiracy theories involving the United States Government to use mythology in order to supposedly cover up advanced technology." It's a bit of a run-on sentence, however, I think it's a start and at least relatively unbiased. I hope this gets cleaned up. Thanks! KinneticSlammer (talk) 17:07, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Richard Doty - individual page?

before I just go off Willy nilly and create one I've been wondering if there's been any discussion here about why Richard Doty doesn't have a page establishing his rich and textured history in the UFO community of basically being a disinformation agent and sometimes selling the truth and fairly and balancedly somehow attempting to present that? Knoxster1969 (talk) 13:51, 30 January 2024 (UTC)