Talk:Respect is Earned (2007)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Respect is Earned (2007) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Spoilers are not good
editI realize this was not a live event but no one other than those who went to the event have seen it. It is airing on PPV for the first time today later tonight. Last I knew wikipedia was not a spoiler site. For the next ROH ppv which still has no name they have also already spoiled the event on it's wiki page. In the future would it not be better to enforce waiting till the event airs? UnknownToaster 22:33, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Attendence
editDoes anyone have the attendence from the show? Rypcord 12:55, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
- Unofficial, but it should be around 3K. The Manhattan Center holds about 3K people and ROH said at the event that it was sold out. TJ Spyke 22:32, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Title
editShould this article use an ROH prefix? The name of the PPV is simply Respect is Earned and there is no disambiguation issues. I know there seems to be some usage of the company name followed by the PPV, however this is not consistant as displayed by SummerSlam and WrestleMania. –– Lid(Talk) 14:00, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- It's not a big deal to me either way, I just think that it looks better with the ROH initials. TJ Spyke 22:38, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
PPV Matches vs Event Matches
editDoes anyone think it would be beneficial to denote which matches aired on pay-per-view and which were not televised? WikiFew 02:30, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Non-televised matches are considered dark matches, and they are already marked from what I can see. Lrrr IV 06:02, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Rohrespectisearnedposter.jpg
editImage:Rohrespectisearnedposter.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.