Talk:Republic of Serbian Krajina/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Name

Title Republic of Serbian Krajina is INAPPROPRIATE because such a nominal change is necessary and rename in the "Self-proclaimed Republic of Serbian Krajina".

Explanation: never formally did not exist "Republic of Serbian Krajina" this is a space that is occupied and operated by a war criminal Fikret Abdic during the aggression on Bosnia and Herzegovina. In this context, the title of this article should be changed to "Self-proclaimed Republic of Serbian Krajina".!!! Please bring reliable sources!!! Udruzenjegec 13:11, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

The policy here is WP:POVTITLE - non-neutral but common names. It's reasonably clear that the entity is self-proclaimed from the article content, so the short form is used for the title. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 14:25, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Licna karta Republike Srpske Krajine.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Licna karta Republike Srpske Krajine.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:25, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Krajina Dinar.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Krajina Dinar.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Krajina Dinar.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:28, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

leader lists

With this edit summary, I merged the lists into this article in November last year. Sundostund, why did your recent reverts have no summaries explaining them? What possible reason do we have to have these articles separated? --Joy [shallot] (talk) 22:52, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

I fail to see the point in having two separate lists, one with a total of 4 items and the other one with 6, for offices which existed for about four years between 1991 and 1995. These should be merged into the main article. Timbouctou (talk) 21:15, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

I've merged them again, no new content seemed to have been added so there's still no point in such standalone articles. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 12:34, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Ambiguity

“ The territory was legally protected by the [[United Nations Protection Force]] (UNPROFOR) and the Army of Serbian Krajina that frequently attacked neighbouring [[Bihać]] enclave (then in the [[Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina]]) with heavy artillery. ”

The territory was protected by UNPROFOR and Army of Serbian Krajina? How is it related to the fact that RSK forces attacked Bihac? Alæxis_¿question? 06:37, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Its not. It was probably added by a Croatian user to show how "evil" the UNPROFOR protection was. That would be my guess. -- Director (talk) 08:07, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Graph colours in small resolution hides different segments

Hi the "Others" and "Croats" in this graph appear to be one segment in the article. Only by clicking full view are the differences visible. Thanks, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 19:58, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Parastate

The Republic of Serbian Krajina was a parastate within an independent one, so a correction of that slight error is necessary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.147.134.21 (talk) 19:37, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Yes, this word does exist. However google books search shows that RSK is called self-proclaimed state more often. Since parastate means "a region that seeks or claims but does not have the status of a recognized independent state" using both "self-proclaimed" and "parastate" is redundant. Alæxis_¿question? 09:19, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Krajina can not be a client state of Serbia

Krajina has always had its own government, independent from Serbia - Serbia was under otoman occupation while Krajina was a free respected independent State that didn't pay tax to Habsburger monarchy! Please - make corrections ! There is a new site of Krajina's Government on krajinauprogonstvu.in.rs — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.167.57.80 (talk) 09:26, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

"...a free respected independent State". Wikipedia is not a place for fairytales. Walter9 (talk) 18:30, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Republic of Serbian Krajina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061109115648/https://usinfo.state.gov/dhr/Archive/2004/Jan/29-319268.html to http://usinfo.state.gov/dhr/Archive/2004/Jan/29-319268.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080315041821/http://www.refugees.org/countryreports.aspx?id=822 to http://www.refugees.org/countryreports.aspx?id=822
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070609212406/http://www.sibenik.hr/vodic/kultura/sibensko_kazaliste.asp to http://www.sibenik.hr/vodic/kultura/sibensko_kazaliste.asp
• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6DAfb6gsS?url=http://www.profil-mozaik.hr/?cmd=show_proizvod to http://www.profil.hr/index.php?cmd=show_proizvod&proizvod_id=30205
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080227044821/http://lawreview.kentlaw.edu/articles/80-1/Hasani%20PDF3.pdf to http://lawreview.kentlaw.edu/articles/80-1/Hasani%20PDF3.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930181749/http://www.ejil.org/journal/Vol3/No1/art13.html to http://www.ejil.org/journal/Vol3/No1/art13.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110529223410/http://207.57.19.226/journal/Vol3/No1/art12-13.pdf to http://207.57.19.226/journal/Vol3/No1/art12-13.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120728082419/http://www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/comexpert/ANX/III.htm to http://www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/comexpert/ANX/III.htm
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N95/766/51/PDF/N9576651.pdf?OpenElement
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.veritas.org.rs/slike/krajina.jpg

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:31, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Croatian nationalism

Discrimination of the Serbian language and the Cyrillic alphabet in Croatia was one of the reasons for the Serb rebellion. Why did you remove this information? Good croats and bad Serbs, yes ? ))) Соколрус (talk) 18:18, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Good croats and bad Serbs? YES  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.180.106.198 (talk) 13:15, 25 September 2015 (UTC) 

Because this was not a fact! Research a bit before you come up with fairytales. --MateoKatanaCRO (talk) 11:45, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Serbian Krajina Map with municipalities and Regions

A map with the then municipalities and little more concrete boundary line of the Republic of Serbian Krajina should be added, so that the article about the Republic of Serbian Krajina look more professional. --DarkoRatic (talk) 13:49, 17 May 2019 (UTC)