Talk:Repeated sequence (DNA)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
 | This article was the subject of an educational assignment. Further details are available [[Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/University of
Michigan/CHEM_455_505_Special_Topics_in_Biochemistry_-_Nucleic_Acids_Bi ochemistry_(Fall_2022)|on the course page]]. |
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Raspberry Neuron (talk • contribs) 18:01, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Educational Assignment edit
This page was edited for a course assignment at the University of Michigan. The editing process included peer review by four students, the Chemistry librarian at the University of Michigan, and course instructors. The edits published on 12/01/2022 reflect improvements guided by the original editing team and the peer review feedback. See the article's History page for information about what changes were made from the previous version. User:Raspberry Neuron
Ideas edit
Considering adding genetic reasons for repeated sequences such as improper crossing over. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ElliotGrady (talk • contribs) 23:15, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
I'm wondering if this page needs to be combined with Tandem repeats or vise versa Theodoreesquires (talk) 11:35, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Controversy on topic of "Junk DNA" edit
There should be a link to this paper that discusses the controversy related to this Wikipedia page. 185.182.71.28 (talk) 18:37, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- For those who are interested, I'm covering this on my blog.
- "Nils Walter disputes junk DNA: (6) The C-value paradox"
- https://sandwalk.blogspot.com/2024/03/nils-walter-disputes-junk-dna-6-c-value.html Genome42 (talk) 23:03, 5 March 2024 (UTC)