Talk:Relocation of Wimbledon F.C. to Milton Keynes/GA1

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Notjamesbond (talk) 17:17, 2 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


This article was mainly there but needed some help to tidy up in order to achieve GA status. Any issues that I came across I tried to rectify as they were generally only small.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    some sections that seemed to be partisan, tidied up to make more generic
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
    I personally would like to see the intro referenced but i understand that this is an optional requirement.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    some really good referencing, some that couldn't be verified as in books and subscriptions needed but use of notes was good and I would find it unlikely that any of the sources were unreliabl
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
    there were some sections that I was uncomfortable with but these were amended
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: