Talk:Reggie Ball/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently does not meet the criteria and is now on hold until improvements are made.--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:46, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

• It is reasonably well written.

  a (prose): b (MoS):

The prose is OK, a 6/10.

Lead is much too short, expand so that it gives a clear summary of the whole article.

• It is factually accurate and verifiable.

  a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

• I see tags, sort them out.

• It is broad in its coverage.

  a (major aspects): b (focused):

I'd like to see more on his personal life, and his professional career is poorly covered and should be expanded in clear, sourced paragraphs.

• It follows the neutral point of view policy.

  a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

• It is stable.

  

• It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

  a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

• Overall:

  a Pass/Fail:

No sign of significant improvement. This article now fails GAR and will be delisted.--Jackyd101 (talk) 20:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)