Talk:Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Muchnick

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 22 September 2013 by reviewer Delirium (talk · contribs).

U.S. Supreme Court cases

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

No discussion of the Court's holding edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

While the article extensively discusses the arguments before the Supreme Court, it does not explain what the Court did beside the first paragraph. Instead, it simply lists the authors of the opinions. What the Justices' opinions were, we are left to wonder. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.243.1.164 (talk) 18:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

I've added information per Oyez of the Chicago-Kent College of Law. Tarheel95 (Sprechen) 22:55, 12 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic