 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Unbiased: I believe so, yes.
Referenced: Well referenced - uses notable organizations’ websites.
Notable/Important: Very informative information, especially for someone interested in gaining additional certifications.
Complete Yet Concise: Very complete; Not quite concise – for example, the first sentence: Is coursework required for certification, or is certification actually coursework? Perhaps you can talk about what a reading specialist is first, and then say that the certification is required to become a specialist. Then talk about coursework, etc.
Visual: Break it up into sections so it is a little less “large” looking. Suggestions: IRA Standards, USDE Standards, Individual State Standards, School Standards.
Linked: The link is great, and relevant, but label it so I know where I’m going when I click on it.
Clearly Written: Very informative and well written, but again, a little wordy – with a bit of editing it can be more concise.
Izzo.t (talk) 00:16, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Reading specialist certification page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Reading specialist certification" page.
