Talk:Rancho Camulos/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:55, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   I fixed two dead links. However a number of important statemnets are unreferenced, I have tagged them. All sources appear reliable.

   Done. howcheng {chat} 00:52, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Some referencing issues to be fixed, on hold for seven days, major contributors and projects will be notified. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:28, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

   OK, everything alright now. Keep GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:22, 22 November 2009 (UTC)