Talk:Rakie Ayola/GA1
Latest comment: 15 years ago by ThinkBlue in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- Throughout the article, link "Sahara", "thriller", "Waking the Dead", "Zimbabwean", "Western Mail", and "Dido" to their correspondence articles. Since this article is Welsh, in the Career section, wouldn't "cancel" be "cancelled"? Also, per here. Same section, could the dates be given ---> "Ayola's other notable television appearances include the BBC psychological thriller Green-Eyed Monster, soap opera EastEnders, Channel 4 drama Offenders, as well as Waking the Dead, London's Burning, Murder in Mind, The Canterbury Tales and Sea of Souls", so that it can provide context for the reader.
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- It would help if an image can be inserted to the article, so it can illustrate the significance of it. But, if an image can't be found, I won't fail the article because of that.
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!
- Pass or Fail:
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 18:56, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- Many thanks for your review! I believe I've addressed all the points you raised, apart from the lack of an image. Much as I would like the include one, there are unfortunately none available in the public domain at the present time. I will, however, be sure to add one should one become available in the future :) Frickative 22:41, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- No problem, just trying to help. Yes, you've gotten the concerns and thank you. Like I've said, I can't fail the article because there's no image, so its fine. Thank you to Frickative for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:57, 8 December 2008 (UTC)