Talk:RAF Coastal Command during World War II/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk) 18:15, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   The article is very well written.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   References are well used and numerous.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Covers the subject comprehensively.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   The article maintains a neutral point of view.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   The article is not subject to any edit warring.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   All images are covered by public domain or fair use licences. Could File:Vickers Warwick B ASR Mk1 - BV285.jpg now be tagged as in the public domain?

7. Overall: Excellent article. This covers the topic really well. Harrison49 (talk) 21:49, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

   Pass/Fail: